Yes a seperate one, again :stuck_out_tongue. (Something in general true regarding spam)įeeless. If you need to pay for them, people will quickly stop doing that. Since IOTA is feeless, I can spam all day long double spends. Eg while IOTA should have speed advantages compared to blockchains, the FPC voting on double spends means that double spends take more processing power than valid transactions, contrary to blockchains. Which is obviously an advantage, but it also opens up the possibility of attacks which are otherwise not a big deal. Yes it is history, but it does make you wonder how anyone could have thought it was a good idea.įeeless. So as suzoh said: "hard to buy" should be top priority along with getting partners to adopt the techĬopying what I wrote a while ago in Discord, with one extra: Those two things will smooth a lot of the issues. IOTA still has a lot of work to do in front of it, yes I don't like the internal IF battles and issues, but I think that as ugly and messy as those are the first thing they need is a mass of people behind the project, both in terms of companies adopting the tech and investors investing in the coin.
Iota reddit crypto android#
That being said, please realize that imperfect projects do succeed, in fact sometimes more than 'more perfect' projects: Look at Betamax, look at Apple (Windows and Android are more popular in their respective silo)
Iota reddit crypto Patch#
Both companies have missed hundreds of deadlines over the years, they patch things up as they go along, just look at the UI of Windows as a prime example. One thing I like to compare it too - and yes I know it is not a fair comparison - is to companies like Microsoft and Google, in the 90s Microsoft was hated, their leadership despised! Google puts out products and projects and abandons them a year later leaving their customers high and dry. I think all of these concerns are valid - the IF, the deadlines, adoption.
0 kommentar(er)
